Forthcoming Articles

Public Health Weekly Report

Published online March 5, 2025

© The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency

Results of the 2024 Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Disease Crisis Management Response Training

Eun-Mi Park, Hyojin Hur1, Bryan Inho Kim, Sang-Gu Yeo

1Division of Emergency Infectious Disease Response, Department of Infectious Disease Emergency Preparedness and Response, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency

이름: 여상구
유선 전화번호: +82-43-719-9100
e-mail: yeosg@korea.kr

Abstract

Objective: This paper analyzes the results of the 2024 response training for emerging and re-emerging infectious disease crisis management and proposes improvements for future training.
Methods: The training evaluation consisted of institutional assessments by metropolitan and provincial governments, individual assessments of trainees, and a satisfaction survey.
Results: In 2024, the training was conducted with a focus on metropolitan and provincial governments. A total of 16 regions participated in the training, involving 480 institutions and 1,334 participants.
Conclusion: Based on the 2024 training results, it is necessary to enhance training efficiency by simplifying the evaluation criteria and streamlining training operations.

Key words Emerging Infectious Diseases; Re-emerging Infectious Diseases; Local Government Training; Crisis Management Response Training

On-line First

Public Health Weekly Report

Published online March 5, 2025

Copyright © The Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency.

Results of the 2024 Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Disease Crisis Management Response Training

Eun-Mi Park, Hyojin Hur1, Bryan Inho Kim, Sang-Gu Yeo

1Division of Emergency Infectious Disease Response, Department of Infectious Disease Emergency Preparedness and Response, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency

Correspondence to:이름: 여상구
유선 전화번호: +82-43-719-9100
e-mail: yeosg@korea.kr

Abstract

Objective: This paper analyzes the results of the 2024 response training for emerging and re-emerging infectious disease crisis management and proposes improvements for future training.
Methods: The training evaluation consisted of institutional assessments by metropolitan and provincial governments, individual assessments of trainees, and a satisfaction survey.
Results: In 2024, the training was conducted with a focus on metropolitan and provincial governments. A total of 16 regions participated in the training, involving 480 institutions and 1,334 participants.
Conclusion: Based on the 2024 training results, it is necessary to enhance training efficiency by simplifying the evaluation criteria and streamlining training operations.

Keywords: Emerging Infectious Diseases, Re-emerging Infectious Diseases, Local Government Training, Crisis Management Response Training

PHWR